![]()
Gone, But Not Forgotten? What The Internet Will Look Like Under SOPA Fearsgiving Week Jesus Approves of Waterboarding Beware of Asteroids ![]() ![]()
![]() All links are current as of the date of publication. All content created by the author is copyrighted 2005-2010, except where held by the owners/publishers of parent works and/or subject materials. Any infringement of another's work is wholly unintentional. If you see something here that is yours, a polite request for removal or credit will be honored. |
� |
No Nobel For RushWednesday, Oct. 17, 2007 3:51 AMFrom the Unclear on the Concept Department comes the Landmark Legal Foundation's nomination of conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh for the Nobel Peace Prize. The Foundation nominated Limbaugh, who sits on Landmark's board of directors, back in February, citing his two decades of '... tireless efforts to promote liberty, equality and opportunity for all mankind, regardless of race, creed, economic stratum or national origin.' Unfortunately for Limbaugh, the nominations don't work that way. And after reading my daily dose of political news and bloggery, it's occurred to me there's an abuse of the English language in the term 'bipartisan'. The definition for partisan is 'a firm adherent to a party, faction, cause, or person, especially one exhibiting blind, prejudiced, and unreasoning allegiance. Yet bipartisan is held to be cooperation between two groups, ignoring the pejorative connotations of the word from which it is derived.
|